An Evidence-Informed Theory of Change for Facilitating Disengagement from Violent Extremism: Insights from the Community Integration Support Program
Keywords:
Disengagement, Pro-Integration, Countering Violent Extremism, Rehabilitation, Theory of Change, Terrorism, Program TheoryAbstract
This paper addresses a persistent issue in the literature on countering violent extremism (CVE): the lack of robust program theory and an accepted analytical framework for understanding change mechanisms and measuring outcomes. The absence of a comprehensive theory of change in CVE programming can hinder conceptual clarity and practical understanding of the intervention philosophy, weakening the basis for intended outcomes and underlying mechanisms of change. The authors present an evidence-informed theory of change for the Community Integration Support Program (CISP), the longest-running CVE program in Australia. This mixed methods research, which combines quantitative analysis of detailed client assessments and 52 semi-structured interviews with clients and other key stakeholders, examines the main program ingredients that enable the CISP to achieve its intended outcome of client disengagement from terrorism and violent extremism. The results provide novel insights into the change mechanisms of CVE interventions that aim to support disengagement from terrorism and violent extremism, highlighting the need for programs to be holistic, tailored to individual needs, and delivered in a culturally appropriate way by trusted and skilled staff. The findings also indicate that most clients do not show substantive positive change until three or more years in the program. The authors encourage CVE interventions to move beyond ill-defined or generic theories of change to ones that are evidence-based and context-specific.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by Victoria Police and conducted in partnership with the Board of Imams Victoria (BOIV).
References
Adams, B., Stahl, G., & Oberg, G. (2023). ‘The Ideology Becomes a Way to Make Sense of That Disconnection’: Beliefs, Behaviour and Belonging – Does Ideology Matter in Countering Violent Extremism? Critical Studies on Terrorism, 16(4), 648-671.
Barrelle, K. (2015). Pro-Integration: Disengagement from and Life after Extremism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(2), 129–42.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. Sage.
Brett, J. (2023). Enhancing the Quality of P/CVE Programming through Robust Application of Theory of Change. Conflict, Security & Development, 23, 447–64.
Brouillette-Alarie, S., Hassan, G., Varela, W., …, & Pickup, D. (2022). Systematic Review on the Outcomes of Primary and Secondary Prevention Programs in the Field of Violent Radicalization. Journal for Deradicalization, 30, 117–68.
Bryman, A. (2006). Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Research: How Is It Done? Qualitative Research, 6(1), 97–113.
Cherney, A., & Belton, E. (2023). The Evaluation of Case-managed Programs Targeting Individuals at Risk of Radicalisation. Terrorism and Political Violence, 35(4), 846–865.
Cherney, A., & Koehler, D. (2023). What Does Sustained Desistance from Violent Extremism Entail: A Proposed Theory of Change and Policy Implications. Terrorism and Political Violence. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2023.2215348
Cherney, A. (2018). Supporting Disengagement and Reintegration: Qualitative Outcomes from a Custody-Based Counter Radicalisation Intervention. Journal for Deradicalization, 17, 1–27.
Coroners Court of Victoria (2017). Inquest into the Death of Ahmad Numan Haider. http://www.coronerscourt.vic.gov.au/home/coroners+written+findings/finding+inquest+into+the+death+of+ahmad+numan+haider.
Feve, S., & Dean, C. (2020). Cooperating With Civil Society to Rehabilitate and Reintegrate Violent Extremist Prisoners. Global Center on Cooperative Security. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep26101.
Funnell, S., & Rogers, P. (2011). Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models. Wiley.
Global Counter Terrorism Forum. (2016). Rome Memorandum on Good Practices for Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Violent Extremist Offenders. https://www.thegctf.org/Portals/1/Documents/Framework%20Documents/Rome%20Memorandum%20-%20ENG.pdf?ver=2016-03-29-134610-213.
Hanson, R. K. (2018). Long-Term Recidivism Studies Show That Desistance Is the Norm. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(9), 1340–46.
Harris-Hogan, S., Barrelle, K., & Zammit, A. (2016). What Is Countering Violent Extremism? Exploring CVE Policy and Practice in Australia. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 8(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2015.1104710.
Horgan, J., Meredith, K., & Papatheodorou, K. (2020). Does Deradicalization Work? In.
D. Silva & M. Deflem (Eds.), Radicalization and Counter-Radicalization (pp. 9-20). Emerald Publishing.
Jugl, I., Lösel, F., Bender, D., & King, S. (2021). Psychosocial Prevention Programs against Radicalization and Extremism: A Meta-Analysis of Outcome Evaluations. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 13(1), 37–46.
Kamil Abdulsalam, Y., Theeboom, M., & Coalter, F. (2023). Football-Based Prevention of Radicalisation: A Theory of Change for Football-Based Prevention of Radicalisation. Journal for Deradicalization, 35, 138-173.
Khalil, J., Horgan, J., & Zeuthen, M. (2022). The Attitudes-Behaviors Corrective (ABC) Model of Violent Extremism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 34(3), 425-450.
Khalil, J., Zeuthen, M., & Marsden, S. V. (2023). A Guide to Deradicalisation & Disengagement Programming: Designing and Implementing Interventions through the Lens of the ABC Model. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats.
Koehler, D. (2024). A Relative Deprivation-Based Theory of Preventing and Countering
Violent Extremism: Policy Implications for Program Design and Deradicalization Work. Crime & Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287241264244
Koehler, D. (2017). Understanding Deradicalization: Methods, Tools and Programs for Countering Violent Extremism. Routledge.
Lay, K., & Harper, D. (2017). Expert Panel on Terrorism and Violent Extremism Prevention and Response Powers - Report 2. Government of Victoria. https://apo.org.au/node/120241.
Lewis, J., & Marsden, S. (2023). Secondary Countering Violent Extremism (CVE)
Interventions: A Rapid Review of the Literature. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/resources/secondary-countering-violent-extremism-cve-interventions-a-rapid-review-of-the-literature/.
McLaughlin, J., & Jordan, G. (1999). Logic Models: A Tool for Telling Your Programs Performance Story. Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(1), 65–72.
Malet, D. (2021). Countering Violent Extremism: Assessment in Theory and Practice. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 16(1), 58–74.
Marsden, S. V. (2017). Reintegrating Extremists: Deradicalisation and Desistance. Palgrave Macmillan.
Marsden, S. V. (2015). Conceptualizing ‘Success’ with Those Convicted of Terrorism Offences: Aims, Methods, and Barriers to Reintegration. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 7(2), 143–65.
Maruna, S. (2016). Desistance and Restorative Justice: It’s Now or Never. Restorative Justice, 4(3), 289-301.
Morrison, J. F., Silke, A., Maiberg, H., Slay, C., & Stewart, R. (2021). A Systematic Review of Post-2017 Research on Disengagement and Deradicalisation. Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. https://dspace.lib.cranfield.ac.uk/handle/1826/17508.
Oakes, D., & Dredge, S. (2016). Australian Jihadi Convicted over Melbourne Terror Plot Reportedly Killed Fighting for Islamic State. ABC News, September 6. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-09-06/australian-convicted-over-melbourne-terror-plot-killed-reports/7818744
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice. SAGE.
Punch, M. (1986). The Politics and Ethics of Fieldwork. Sage.
Raets, S. (2022). Trial and Terror: Countering Violent Extremism and Promoting Disengagement in Belgium. Journal for Deradicalization, 30, 223–61.
Renard, T. (2020). Overblown: Exploring the Gap Between the Fear of Terrorist Recidivism and the Evidence. Combating Terrorism Center at West Point, 13(4), 19–29. https://ctc.westpoint.edu/overblown-exploring-the-gap-between-the-fear-of-terrorist-recidivism-and-the-evidence/
Rogers, P. (2014). Theory of Change: Methodological Briefs - Impact Evaluation No. 2.” Methodological Briefs. UNICEF Office of Research – Innocenti. https://www.unicef-irc.org/publications/747-theory-of-change-methodological-briefs-impact-evaluation-no-2.html.
Romaniuk, P. (2015). Does CVE Work? Lessons Learned From the Global Effort to Counter Violent Extremism. Global Center on Cooperative Security. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep20265.
Silke, A., & Morrison, J. (2020). Re-Offending by Released Terrorist Prisoners: Separating Hype from Reality. ICCT Policy Brief. International Centre for Counter-Terrorism. https://www.icct.nl/sites/default/files/2022-12/Re-Offending-by-Released-Terrorist-Prisoners.pdf
Silke, A., Morrison, J., Maiberg, H., Slay, C., & Stewart, R. (2021). The Phoenix Model of Disengagement and Deradicalisation from Terrorism and Violent Extremism. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 104(3), 310–20.
Stahl, G., Adams, B., & Oberg, G. (2024). “If you don’t have rapport, you haven’t got anything really”: Affective intensities, relationality and rapport building in the work of CVE intervention practitioners. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2024.2380687
Williams, M. J., & Hulse, T. (2023). Shared Endeavour Fund. Call Two: Evaluation Report.
Institute for Strategic Dialogue.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ramón Spaaij, Muhammad Iqbal, Andrew Zammit, Moustapha Sarakibi, Debra Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
