Preventing Violent Extremism through Mentoring? Outcomes and Insights from a Quebec-Based Program

Authors

  • Élise Bourgeois-Guérin TELUQ University
  • Gaëlle Saules University of Quebec in Montreal
  • Joséphine Aldebert Clinical Psychologist
  • Cindy Ngov Recherche et Action sur les Polarisations Sociales (RAPS)
  • Cécile Rousseau McGill University

Keywords:

Violent Extremism, Mentoring, Tertiary Prevention, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

Although research on the tertiary prevention of violent extremism has increased over the past decade, clear benchmarks for best practices remain scarce. Existing studies often suffer from methodological and ethical limitations and seldom incorporate the perspectives of those most directly affected—namely, the individuals targeted by these programs. Nevertheless, a growing body of literature highlights the promise of social rehabilitation approaches, such as mentoring programs. This article examines a mentoring program developed by a Quebec-based clinical team specializing in the prevention of extremism and violent radicalization. It explores the program’s impact from the perspectives of mentees, mentors, and clinicians. Based on a qualitative analysis of 15 individual semi-structured interviews and 2 focus groups, the study identifies the program’s strengths and limitations. Overall, participants viewed the mentoring program positively. Among the positive effects was the creation of a secure relational space that enabled some mentees to break out of isolation through meaningful interpersonal engagement. However, the mentoring relationship also presented challenges, including the potential for mentees to reproduce or reinforce past negative relational experiences. Robust clinical support is therefore essential to mitigate these risks and to safeguard the well-being of both mentees and mentors.

References

Bertelsen, P. (2015). Danish preventive measures and de radicalization strategies: The Aarhus model. Panorama: Insights into Asian and European Affairs, 1(241), 53.

Bourgeois Guérin, É., Rousseau, C., Aldebert, J., & Saules, G. (2025). Radicalisation violente et intervention : le pari du mentorat : promesses et écueils d’un dispositif d’accompagnement périthérapeutique. Criminologie, 58(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.7202/1117822ar

Brouillette Alarie, S., Hassan, G., Varela, W., Ousman, S., Kilinc, D., Savard, É. L., Madriaza, P., Harris Hogan, S., McCoy, J., Rousseau, C., King, M., Venkatesh, V., Borokhovski, E., & Pickup, D. (2022). Systematic review on the outcomes of primary and secondary prevention programs in the field of violent radicalization. Journal for Deradicalization, 30, 117–168. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7620-8786

Charkawi, W., Dunn, K., et Bliuc, A.-M. (2024). Evaluations of countering violent extremism programs: Linking success to content, approach, setting, and participants. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100674

Cherney, A., De Rooy, K., & Eggins, E. (2021). Mandatory participation in programs to counter violent extremism: A review of evidence for and against. Journal for Deradicalization, 2021(27), 1-33.

Dubois, L. D., & Alem, F. (2017). Mentoring and domestic radicalization. National Mentoring Resource Center Research Review. Université de l’Illinois. https://nationalmentoringresourcecenter.org/index.php/component/k2/item/380-mentoring-and-domestic-radicalization.html

Feddes, A. R., & Gallucci, M. (2015). A literature review on methodology used in evaluating effects of preventive and de radicalisation interventions. Journal for Deradicalization, (5), 1–27.

Fustier, P. (2008). La relation d’aide et la question du don. Nouvelle Revue de Psychosociologie, 6(2), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.3917/nrp.006.0027

Gill, P., Clemmow, C., Hetzel, F., Rottweiler, B., Salman, N., Van Der Vegt, I., Marchment, Z., Schumann, S., Zolghadriha, S., Schulten, N., Taylor, H., & Corner, E. (2021). Systematic review of mental health problems and violent extremism. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(1), 51–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2020.1820067

Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis; an essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.

Horgan, J., & Braddock, K. (2010). Rehabilitating the Terrorists?: Challenges in Assessing the Effectiveness of De-radicalization Programs. Terrorism and Political Violence, 22(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546551003594748

Kessels, E., & Veldhuis, T. (2013). The need for more & structural data analysis in detention and rehabilitation of extremist offenders. The International Centre for Counter Terrorism – The Hague, 4(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.19165/2013.1.01

Koehler, D., & Fiebig, V. (2019). Knowing what to do: Academic and practitioner understanding of how to counter violent radicalization. Perspectives on Terrorism, 13(3), 44–62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26681908

LaDonna, K. A., Artino, A. R., Jr., & Balmer, D. F. (2021). Beyond the guise of saturation: Rigor and qualitative interview data. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 13(5), 607–611. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME D 21 00752.1

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Mauss, M., & Weber, F. (2023). Essai sur le don : forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques (3ᵉ éd.). PUF.

Mellier, D. (2006). Précarité psychique et dispositifs d’intervention clinique. Pratiques Psychologiques, 12(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2006.01.008

Misiak, B., Samochowiec, J., Bhui, K., Schouler Ocak, M., Demunter, H., Kuey, L., Raballo, A., Gorwood, P., Frydecka, D., & Dom, G. (2019). A systematic review on the relationship between mental health, radicalization and mass violence. European Psychiatry, 56(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.11.005

Morrison, J. F., Silke, A., Maiberg, H., Slay, C., & Stewart, R. (2021). A systematic review of post 2017 research on disengagement and deradicalisation. CREST Centre for Research and Evidence on Security Threats. https://crestresearch.ac.uk/download/3797/21 033 02.pdf

Morrow, S. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022 0167.52.2.250

Nehlsen, I., Biene, J., Coester, M., Greuel, F., Milbradt, B., & Armborst, A. (2021). Evident and effective? The challenges, potentials and limitations of evaluation research on preventing violent extremism. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 14. https://doi.org/10.4119/ijcv 3801

Paillé, P., & Mucchielli, A. (2021). L’analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales (5ᵉ éd.). Armand Colin.

Hilary Pilkington, & Ajmal Hussain. (2022). Why wouldn’t you consult us? Reflections on preventing radicalisation among actors in radical(ising) milieus. Journal for Deradicalization, Spring, (30), 1–44.

Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137.

Rousseau, C., Frounfelker, R., Ngov, C., & Crocker, A. (2023). Clinical services addressing violent extremism: The Quebec model. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 22(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2022.2147254

Radicalisation Awareness Network. (2016). Approaches to countering radicalisation and dealing with violent extremist and terrorist offenders in prisons and probation. Université de Cambridge. https://api.repository.cam.ac.uk/server/api/core/bitstreams/b76c2420-8020-4217-a4c1-3ffe9a8a95de/content

Silke, A., Morrison, J., Maiberg, H., Slay, C., & Stewart, R. (2021). The Phoenix Model of Disengagement and Deradicalisation from Terrorism and Violent Extremism. Monatsschrift Für Kriminologie Und Strafrechtsreform, 104(3), 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2021-0128

Smith, J. A. (2004). Reflecting on the development of interpretative phenomenological analysis and its contribution to qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088704qp004oa

Spalek, B., & Davies, L. (2012). Mentoring in relation to violent extremism: A study of role, purpose, and outcomes. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 35(5), 354–368.

Roussillon, R. (2005). Les situations extrêmes et la clinique de la survivance psychique. In La santé mentale en actes (p. 221). https://doi.org/10.3917/eres.laval.2005.01.0221

Downloads

Published

2025-09-26

Issue

Section

Articles