A case series of a client-led, non-confrontational, conversational method to address radicalisation
Keywords:
Deradicalisation, Radicalisation, Non-mainstream, Method of LevelsAbstract
This exploratory case series provides foundational knowledge on applying a novel, therapeutic approach – the ‘Method of Levels’ (MOL) – to radical or non-mainstream views. Despite a lack of consensus on deradicalisation approaches in the literature, there is growing agreement and support for the use of empowering dialogue and a non-coercive approach that moves away from confrontational means of dealing with ideologies. In this case series, four people who self-identify as holding radical, or non-mainstream, views, attended a session of MOL and a post-MOL interview. The acceptability of MOL was assessed utilising qualitative and quantitative measures, with findings suggesting that participants found this an acceptable intervention due to the nature of the approach. This case series is an early step in the application of MOL to people with self-identified radical or non-mainstream views.
References
Anvari, M. S., Kleinman, M. B., Dean, D., Rose, A. L., Bradley, V. D., Hines, A. C., ... & Magidson, J. F. (2023). A pilot study of training peer recovery specialists in behavioral activation in the United States: Preliminary outcomes and predictors of competence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5), 3902.
Ashworth, M., Shepherd, M., Christey, J., Matthews, V., Wright, K., Parmentier, H., ... & Godfrey, E. (2004). A client‐generated psychometric instrument: The development of ‘PSYCHLOPS’. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4(2), 27-31.
Bird, T., Wild, A., & Mansell, W. (2019). Method of Levels: Findings of a pilot randomised controlled trial in primary care.
Bird, T., Tai, S., & Hamilton, A. (2020). Method of Levels: findings of a pilot randomised controlled trial in primary care. [online] DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27827.66080.
Braddock, K. (2014). The Talking Cure?: Communication and psychological impact in prison de-radicalisation programmes. In Prisons, terrorism and extremism (pp. 60-74). Routledge.
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance.
Busher, J., Malkki, L., & Marsden, S. (Eds.). (2023). The Routledge Handbook on Radicalisation and Countering Radicalisation. Taylor & Francis.
Cardarelli, A. P., & Hicks, S. C. (1993). Radicalism in law and criminology: A retrospective view of critical legal studies and radical criminology. J. Crim. L. & Criminology, 84, 502.
Carey, T. A. (2006). The method of levels: How to do psychotherapy without getting in the way. Living Control Systems Publ.
Carey, T. A., & Mullan, R. J. (2008). Evaluating the method of levels. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 21(3), 247-256.
Carey, T. A., Mansell, W., & Tai, S. (2015). Principles-based counselling and psychotherapy: A Method of Levels approach. Routledge.
Chatzimike-Levidi, M. D., & Collard, J. J. (2023). An integrated model of aggression: links between core self-evaluations, anger rumination and forgiveness. Current Psychology, 42(34), 30235-30249.
Cherney, A., & Belton, E. (2018). An Evaluation of the Proactive Integrated Support Model (PRISM).
Churchman, A., Mansell, W., & Tai, S. (2019). A school-based feasibility study of method of levels: a novel form of client-led counselling. Pastoral Care in Education, 37(4), 331-346.
Cross, B. J., Collard, J. J., & Levidi, M. D. C. (2023). Core self-evaluation, rumination and forgiveness as an influence on emotional distress. Current Psychology, 42(3), 2087-2099.
Danvers, E. (2023). Prevent/Ing critical thinking? The pedagogical impacts of Prevent in UK higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(6), 1264-1279.
Dudenhoefer, A. (2018). Resisting radicalisation: A critical analysis of the UK Prevent duty. Journal for Deradicalization, 14(1), 154-191.
Evans, C., Ashworth, M., & Peters, M. (2010). Are problems prevalent and stable in non-clinical populations? Problems and test-retest stability of a patient-generated measure, PSYCHLOPS (Psychological Outcome Profiles), in a non-clinical student sample. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 38(4), 431-439.
Gendlin, E.T. (1998). Focusing-oriented psychotherapy: A manual of the experiential method. Guilford Press.
Gill, P., Clemmow, C., Hetzel, F., Rottweiler, B., Salman, N., Van Der Vegt, I., ... & Corner, E. (2021). Systematic review of mental health problems and violent extremism. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 32(1), 51-78.
Griffiths, R., Mansell, W., Carey, T. A., Edge, D., Emsley, R., & Tai, S. J. (2018). Method of levels therapy for first-episode psychosis: rationale, design and baseline data for the feasibility randomised controlled Next Level study. BJPsych Open, 4(5), 339-345.
Griffiths, R., Mansell, W., Edge, D., Carey, T. A., Peel, H., & J. Tai, S. (2019). ‘It was me answering my own questions’: Experiences of method of levels therapy amongst people with first‐episode psychosis. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 28(3), 721-734.
Grzegrzolka, J., & Mansell, W. (2019). A test of the feasibility of a visualization method to show the depth and duration of awareness during Method of Levels therapy. the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 12, e34.
Guest, M., Scott-Baumann, A., Cheruvallil-Contractor, S., Naguib, S., Phoenix, A., Lee, Y., & Al Baghal, T. (2020). Islam and Muslims on UK University Campuses: perceptions and challenges.
Hardy, K. (2019). Countering right-wing extremism: Lessons from Germany and Norway. Journal of policing, intelligence and counter terrorism, 14(3), 262-279.
Harper, D., & Thompson, A. R. (Eds.). (2011). Qualitative research methods in mental health and psychotherapy: A guide for students and practitioners. John Wiley & Sons.
Heath-Kelly, C., & Strausz, E. (2019). The banality of counterterrorism “after, after 9/11”? Perspectives on the Prevent duty from the UK health care sector. Critical Studies on Terrorism, 12(1), 89-109.
Hill, C. E., Thames, T. B., & Rardin, D. R. (1979). Comparison of Rogers, Perls, and Ellis on the Hill Counselor Verbal Response Category System. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 26(3), 198.
HM Government. (2018). CONTEST: The United Kingdom’s Strategy for Countering Terrorism. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office (Cm 9608).
HM Government. (2023). Counter-terrorism strategy (CONTEST) 2023. Gov UK. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/counter-terrorism-strategy-contest-2023
Jenkins, H., Reid, J., Williams, C., Tai, S., & Huddy, V. (2020). Feasibility and patient experiences of method of levels therapy in an acute mental health inpatient setting. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 41(6), 506-514.
Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E., & De Pater, I. E. (2004). Emotional stability, core self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for future research. Human performance, 17(3), 325-346.
Khalil, J., & Zeuthen, M. (2016). Countering violent extremism and risk reduction: A guide to programme design and evaluation.
Kidd, J. D., Kaczmarkiewicz, R., Kreski, N. T., Jackman, K., George, M., Hughes, T. L., & Bockting, W. O. (2023). A qualitative study of alcohol use disorder psychotherapies for transgender and nonbinary individuals: Opportunities for cultural adaptation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 248, 109913.
Krstic, M. (2019). Understanding Deradicalization: Methods, Tools and Programs for Countering Violent Extremism.
Krupnick, J. L., Sotsky, S. M., Elkin, I., Simmens, S., Moyer, J., Watkins, J., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2006). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program. Focus, 64(2), 532-277.
Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 102-120.
Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011). The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. Journal of psychiatric research, 45(5), 626-629.
Macdonald, S., Whiting, A., & Jarvis, L. (2024). Evidence and Ideology in the Independent Review of Prevent. Journal for Deradicalization, (39).
Macintyre, V., Shariff, A., Brown, H., Mansell, W. (In Preparation). A feasibility study of method of levels therapy using a standardized coding scheme.
Manasse, S. M., Lampe, E. W., Abber, S. R., Butler, R., Gillikin, L., & Trainor, C. (2021). Exposure-enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy for adolescents with binge eating: An initial case series. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 26(4), 1124-1136.
Mansell, W., Carey, T. A., & Tai, S. J. (2012). A transdiagnostic approach to CBT using method of levels therapy: Distinctive features. Routledge.
McClelland, K., & Mansell, W. (2019). Resolving Interpersonal and intrapersonal conflicts: A comparison of the practice of mediation with method-of-levels psychotherapy. Journal of Integrated Social Sciences, 9(1), 1-38.
Morgado, F. F., Meireles, J. F., Neves, C. M., Amaral, A., & Ferreira, M. E. (2017). Scale development: ten main limitations and recommendations to improve future research practices. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 30.
Morrison, J. F., Silke, A., Maiberg, H., Slay, C., & Stewart, R. (2021). A systematic review of post-2017 research on disengagement and deradicalisation.
Muluk, H., Umam, A. N., & Milla, M. N. (2020). Insights from a deradicalization program in Indonesian prisons: The potential benefits of psychological intervention prior to ideological discussion. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 23(1), 42-53.
Nayak, B. K. (2010). Understanding the relevance of sample size calculation. Indian journal of ophthalmology, 58(6), 469-470.
Nyklíček, I., Zonneveld, R., & Denollet, J. (2020). Introspective interest and insight in the context of mindfulness-based stress reduction: a randomized trial. Mindfulness, 11, 2176-2188.
O’Toole, T., Meer, N., DeHanas, D. N., Jones, S. H., & Modood, T. (2016). Governing through prevent? Regulation and contested practice in State-Muslim engagement. Sociology, 50(1), 160-177.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research, 42, 533-544.
Peters, E. R., Joseph, S. A., & Garety, P. A. (1999). Measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population: introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory). Schizophrenia bulletin, 25(3), 553-576.
Powers, W. T., & Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception.
Powers, W.T. (2005). Behaviour: The Control of Perception. 2nd ed.
Powers, W. T. (1998). Making sense of behavior. New Canaan, CT: Benchmark.
Powers, W. T., Clark, R. K., & Farland, R. M. (1960). A general feedback theory of human behavior: Part I. Perceptual and motor skills, 11(1), 71-88.
Saeed, T., & Johnson, D. (2016). Intelligence, global terrorism and higher education: Neutralising threats or alienating allies?. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(1), 37-51.
Schmid, A. P. (2013). Radicalisation, de-radicalisation, counter-radicalisation: A conceptual discussion and literature review. ICCT research paper, 97(1), 22.
Scott-Baumann, A. (2017). Ideology, utopia and Islam on campus: How to free speech a little from its own terrors. Education, citizenship and social justice, 12(2), 159-176.
Silke, A., Morrison, J., Maiberg, H., Slay, C., & Stewart, R. (2021). The phoenix model of disengagement and deradicalisation from terrorism and violent extremism. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 104(3), 310-320.
Smith, J. A. (1996). Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: Using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology. Psychology and health, 11(2), 261-271.
Smith, J. A. (2007). Hermeneutics, human sciences and health: Linking theory and practice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on health and Well-being, 2(1), 3-11.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2015). Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain. British journal of pain, 9(1), 41-42.
Spencer, S. D., Meyer, M. S., & Masuda, A. (2023). A case-series study examining acceptance and commitment therapy for experiential avoidance-related mixed anxiety and depression in a telehealth platform. Clinical Case Studies, 22(1), 78-96.
Tai, S. J. (2009). Using perceptual control theory and the method of levels to work with people who experience psychosis. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2(3), 227-242.
Tai, S. J. (2016). An introduction to using the method of levels (MOL) therapy to work with people experiencing psychosis. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 70(1), 125-148.
Thorarinsdottir, K., Holmes, E. A., Hardarson, J., Stephenssen, E. S., Jonasdottir, M. H., Kanstrup, M., ... & Bjornsson, A. (2022). Using a brief mental imagery competing task to reduce the number of intrusive memories: Exploratory case series with trauma-exposed women. JMIR Formative Research, 6(7), e37382.
Thornton, A., & Bouhana, N. (2019). Preventing radicalization in the UK: Expanding the knowledge-base on the Channel programme. Policing: A journal of policy and practice, 13(3), 331-344.
Weeks, D. (2021). Lessons learned from UK efforts to deradicalize terror offenders. CTC Sentinel, 14(3), 33-39.
Zur, O. (2009). Power in psychotherapy and counseling: Exploring the ‘inherent power differential’ and related myths about therapists’ omnipotence and clients’ vulnerability. Independent practitioner, 29(3), 160-164.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jessica Ward, Alicia Brown, Sara Tai, Warren Mansell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The JD Journal for Deradicalization uses a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND) Licence. You are free to share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following conditions:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, andindicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
